The online gambling industry is one of the most revenue-generating branches of the entertainment business; in the US alone in 2019, it generated 40 billion dollars. Online betting platforms allow customers to bet on various games such as races (horse, greyhound, harness racing, etc.) and sports (American football, baseball, basketball, cricket, golf, etc.). Customer retention is a major issue within every online sports betting platform due to extreme competition. Since sports and games are unvarying across the various platforms, customer experience remains the most important factor to retention.
Online gaming services generally experience a high churn rate (around 40% churn) in the first week of their deposits or just after submitting a registration form, i.e., even before placing their first bet. These are the customers who only make one bet and never come back. Currently, marketing teams approach these customers by looking at their betting amounts and win-loss ratio to determine whom to contact and what intervention strategy to apply. These interventions can vary from offering “deposit match” to giving “free bets.”
AI can help predict the likelihood that a player will make at least 1 bet in the next 28 days. Models will be able to identify customers at risk so marketing teams can proactively intervene to influence customers’ behavior. Businesses would be able to reduce their player churn by getting a risk score for players and intervening those who have a high score. Through Prediction Explanations, businesses can understand the reasons behind those scores and then target the riskiest customers. Customer retention teams tailor interventions or offers using the information provided by these explanations. As an example, customer retention teams can offer 100% deposit match offers to customers who fall in the top 2 deciles, 50% to the mid deciles, and 25% to the bottom deciles.
How would I measure ROI for my use case?
To calculate the ROI of this use case, we would need to benchmark the AI model results to your existing churn numbers. As an example:
Let’s say current churn rate @ 30% = ~1000
Reduction in churn rate = ~800
Average earning from one bet = $50 per week
Cost of intervention = $10
Net profit $50 – $10 = $40
Weekly extra revenue generated $40 X 200 = $8,000
Annually ($8,000 X 52) =$416,000
About the Data
For illustrative purposes, this tutorial uses a synthetic dataset that includes players’ past betting activities and demographic data. The features included were all synthetically developed.
The target variable being predicted for this use case is to identify players who will go dormant in the next 28 days, meaning they will not make any bets throughout this duration. This choice in target makes this a binary classification problem.
The features we add to our model include data on the customer, past transactions, and platform activity. Beyond these features, we suggest incorporating any additional data your organization may collect that could be relevant to the use case. As you will see later, DataRobot is able to help you quickly differentiate important vs unimportant features.
Sample Feature List
Joining date of the player
First Deposit Date
Sign_up and Deposit Day is same ,1 ,0
First Time Deposit Amount
First Deposit Type
First time bet type – Free Bet & Cash
Count of bets on racing (F1, Horse race)
Count of bets on sports (Football, Cricket, Rugby)
Total bets placed
Total Bets Amount
Maximum Bet Amount
Minimum Bet Amount
Total Free Bets given to player
Total free bet amount in $$
Amount paid to customer from winning bets
Days Since Last Bet
Number of days since last placed bet
Total Weighted Average Price
Weighted Avg Price of total amount played incl free bets
Number of bets placed during Normal/Odd hours
Count of bets played 9am-9pm (Normal)
Total amt withdrawn
Amount withdrawn between various hours (7am-5pm), (5pm-10pm),(10pm-7am)
Bets made yesterday
Number of bets made t-1
Bets made 2 days ago
Number of bets made t-2
Bets made 3 days ago
Number of bets made t-3
Bets made 10 days ago
Number of bets made in last 10 days
Number of days from sign up
[Horse Race, F1, Soccer, Rugby]
If (player placed a bet within 28 days, 0,1)
DataRobot Machine Learning automates many parts of the modeling pipeline. Instead of having to hand-code and manually test dozens of models to find the one that best fits your needs, DataRobot automatically runs dozens of models and finds the most accurate one for you, all in a matter of minutes. In addition to training the models, DataRobot automates other steps in the modeling process such as processing and partitioning the dataset.
For this use case, the dataset needed a partitioning strategy called Group Partitioning on the Cust ID.
Partitioning by Group ID ensures that all members of the group fall within the same partition. By grouping you learn only from all the observations in specific groups and predict on other groups. This allows you to better assess your performance on new customers that you have never seen before, and build models that are more robust to those new customers.
The magnitude of importance is ranked from most important feature on the top of the list to least important. In the chart below, Days since_last_bet is the most important feature, followed by # Bets_last_month, Total_Amount_Deposit, Same_Day_Deposit, etc.
In assessing the partial dependence plots to further evaluate the marginal impact top features have on the predicted outcome, we learn that players who have placed their last bet recently are less likely to churn than players who have not placed a bet in a while. Also, the number of bets placed in recent months has an inverse relationship on the likelihood of churn. Additional insights can be discovered such as players who placed their bet on the day of signing up are less likely to churn and a few states are riskier than others.
DataRobot’s Prediction Explanations provide a more granular view to interpret the model results. (More information on Prediction Explanations is provided in the public documentation.)
Here, we see why a given player was predicted to churn or not, based on the top predictive features.
We want the model to learn the ranking of the probabilities so we can focus on the customers with high probability scores. Therefore, AUC was chosen as an optimization metric.
Churn use cases benefit from the model’s ability to correctly predict as many True Positives as possible while also minimizing False Positives.
The probabilities given by the chosen model were exported to the data source which can then be provided to marketing teams. We used DataRobot’s Lift Chart to identify which players to reach out to (those likely to churn) and which can be ignored (are most likely to convert).
After you choose the right model that best fits your data, DataRobot makes it easy to deploy the model into your desired decision environment. Decision environments are the methods by which predictions will ultimately be used for decision-making.
Automation | Augmentation | Blend
The model enables customer retention teams to focus their efforts on customers who can be retained by either giving them a call or sending them an email. This will make retention teams’ jobs much easier and improve the overall conversion rate across the board.
The model’s output needs to be consumed in an actionable way to be able to get real value; otherwise it will turn into an experimental project with no tangible value to the business. The output of the model—a list of players which our model thinks are more likely to churn—will get sent to the customer retention team. The decision engine can either be a simple CSV file or integration with CRM systems; either way, DataRobot makes it easy for end users to use these predictions.
For instance, the predictions can be integrated with Microsoft Power BI to create a dashboard that can be accessed by the customer retention team to support decisions on prioritizing which customers to reach out to offerfree bets. Models score the customer at risk overnight and send the resulting predictions to the Power BI dashboard. The list of those customers, their propensity score, and Prediction Explanations associated with the score will be sent to the retention call center.
Decision executors consume the predictions and make decisions on a daily/weekly basis. This can be a member of:
Customer Service Team
Decision managers are the executive stakeholders who will monitor and manage the program to analyze the performance of the rate of customer churn.
Chief Marketing Officer
Customer Experience Officer
Manager Customer Engagement
Decision authors are the technical stakeholders who will set up the decision flow in place.
Customer UX analyst
Customer engagement analyst
Different thresholds can be set to decide which intervention strategy to implement. These intervention strategies may include: sending a notification about an upcoming race or game, giving a player a “free bet,” offering a “deposit match offer,” calling the player to give a customized offer, etc.
These thresholds depend on companies’ risk appetites and the profitability of the books.
Assigning a different intervention to each cohort of players can be beneficial and reduces the unnecessary expenditure on those who are to influence.
High Risk: These players have a high likelihood of churn and likely have already made up their minds to leave. The retention team will have to work very hard to save these players.
Medium Risk: These are the cohort of players who can be influenced; the retention team should focus on this group. These players have stopped betting because they are looking for competitive offers; therefore, once the retention team gives them an extra “free bet” or DMO, these players will place the bets again.
Low Risk: These players can be saved by sending touch base emails or giving them one-off free bets. Intervention costs are low and conversion rate is high.
Decision Operators: IT/System Operations, Data Scientists
Prediction Cadence: Batch predictions generated on a daily basis
Model Retraining Cadence: Models retrained once data drift reaches an assigned threshold. Otherwise, retrain the models at the beginning of every new operating quarter.
Unsuccessful Intervention Strategies—Player decisions to stay or leave depend on the interventions decided by the marketing managers. If these interventions are not properly designed and implemented, then even if the model is highly accurate, the business ROI would still be low.
In addition to traditional risk analysis, the following elements of AI Trust may require attention in this use case.
Target leakage:Target leakage describes information that should not be available at the time of prediction being used to train the model. That is, particular features may leak information about the eventual outcome that will artificially inflate the performance of the model in training. This use case requires the aggregation of historical data, making it vulnerable to potential target leakage. In the design of this model and the preparation of data, it is pivotal to identify the point of prediction and ensure no data be included past that time. DataRobot additionally supports robust target leakage detection in the second round of exploratory data analysis and the selection of the Informative Features feature list during autopilot. (Learn more here about target leakage.)
Experience the DataRobot AI Platform
Less Friction, More AI. Get Started Today With a Free 30-Day Trial.
The gaming industry leverages AI to predict user behavior, optimize odds, and ensure fair play. From enhancing online sports betting experiences to detecting fraudulent activities, AI plays a pivotal role in ensuring a secure and engaging environment for players.